View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Hanzo the Razor
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:17 am |
|
 |
Ancient Alien Theorist
|
Joined: | 24 Jun 2007 |
Posts: | 105341 |
Location: | The Fourth World |
Bannings: | 2001 |
|
The negativity toward the '89 Batman and the recent positivity toward Daredevil has me curious on which is more popular 'round here.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rafael
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:22 am |
|
 |
Traveler
|
Joined: | 03 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 33377 |
Location: | 2015 |
Bannings: | 3 |
|
Gah, this one is difficult.
One one hand, DD is a terrible movie, but I don't give a crap about Daredevil. Batman is a better movie, but I absolutely hate it as an adaptation.
A tie.
_________________ Are you ready? Are you ready to jump right off the edge of everything?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Monk
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:24 am |
|
Joined: | 19 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 35552 |
Location: | Between the thumb and the wrist. |
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Dave Toxik
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:24 am |
|
 |
Mr. Eh?
|
Joined: | 12 Mar 2007 |
Posts: | 25349 |
|
BATMAN. That one I could watch three times, at least.
A very flawed movie. However, as someone observed correctly in the DD DIRECTORS CUT thread, the only good scenes in the DD movie were scenes oh-so-obviously cribbed from the comics.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Ross
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:11 am |
|
 |
Not in Continuity
|
Joined: | 03 Jun 2007 |
Posts: | 24101 |
Location: | Massachusetts |
|
Very close, but I liked the look and the performances better in Batman.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Frank L. Sisko
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:13 am |
|
 |
Emissary to the Prophets
|
Joined: | 25 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 28198 |
Location: | On the DEFIANT |
|
DAREDEVIL was, In My Opinion™, caca doodie poopie. BATMAN was flawed, but still the better film.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rob Steinbrenner
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:14 am |
|
Joined: | 05 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 49778 |
|
Batman was a great movie for its time. Made a lot of people try the comics. Doesn't hold up so well, but at the time. DD never was as good or had that impact.
_________________ I apologize for the above post.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Uncle Twitchy
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:17 am |
|
Joined: | 28 Nov 2006 |
Posts: | 30520 |
|
Frank L. Sisko wrote: DAREDEVIL was, In My Opinion™, caca doodie poopie. BATMAN was flawed, but still the better film. QFT
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rawburn
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:28 am |
|
Joined: | 24 Sep 2004 |
Posts: | 13716 |
Location: | ToWANto |
Bannings: | Too ignored to be banned. |
|
Was Daredevil really THAT bad? Batman was good at the time, but doesn't really hold up as well.
_________________ Bigmouth strikes again!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rob Steinbrenner
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:29 am |
|
Joined: | 05 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 49778 |
|
No it wasn't that bad. Yes Batman doesn't hold up as well. Especially with the knox scenes.
_________________ I apologize for the above post.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rafael
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:38 am |
|
 |
Traveler
|
Joined: | 03 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 33377 |
Location: | 2015 |
Bannings: | 3 |
|
Rawburn wrote: Was Daredevil really THAT bad? Yes. No, it wasn't Ghost Rider/Catwoman/Batman and Robin (The Unholy Trinity) bad. But it was still a pretty wretched movie.
_________________ Are you ready? Are you ready to jump right off the edge of everything?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rob Steinbrenner
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:39 am |
|
Joined: | 05 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 49778 |
|
Also, Ghost Rider was fun.
_________________ I apologize for the above post.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rawburn
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:48 am |
|
Joined: | 24 Sep 2004 |
Posts: | 13716 |
Location: | ToWANto |
Bannings: | Too ignored to be banned. |
|
I need to watch DD again, I didn't mind it much... despite the flaws. Never did see Catwoman (and I won't) or Ghost Rider (I'd watch it on TV).
_________________ Bigmouth strikes again!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Todd
IMWAN Mod |
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:52 am |
|
 |
I am not Taupe
|
Joined: | 14 Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 22614 |
Location: | Chiss |
|
Batman 'and its not even close'™.
_________________
--
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rob Steinbrenner
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:54 am |
|
Joined: | 05 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 49778 |
|
Catwoman was all sorts of lousy. Although oddly because it was hyped as so lousy it wasn't quite as lousy as I thought it'd be.
GR is a definite B movie with A level special effects. The demons from Hell are Emo losers. It's definitely not great. But I thought it was kinda fun. My wife actually liked it a lot better than me for some reason.
_________________ I apologize for the above post.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Monk
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:58 am |
|
Joined: | 19 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 35552 |
Location: | Between the thumb and the wrist. |
|
The only modern (post-Blade) comic book films that I hate or refuse to see are Ghost Rider, Elektra, Punisher, and Catwoman (haven't seen). None of them are even in the same ballpark as Batman and Robin. And Daredevil, even with it's flaws, isn't in the same ballpark as any of those films.
_________________ Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Uncle Twitchy
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:01 am |
|
Joined: | 28 Nov 2006 |
Posts: | 30520 |
|
Monk wrote: The only modern (post-Blade) comic book films that I hate or refuse to see are Ghost Rider, Elektra (haven't seen), Punisher (haven't seen), Batman and Robin and Catwoman (haven't seen). None of them are even in the same ballpark as Superman Returns. And Daredevil, even with it's flaws, isn't in the same ballpark as any of those films. Fixed to apply to me.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rob Steinbrenner
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:02 am |
|
Joined: | 05 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 49778 |
|
I really thought Punisher was good. My wife has seen it like 5-6 times. I have to emphasize how rare that it. She also loves Grease and Saturday Night Fever but I think that's a coincidence  I've had no interest in Elektra. the only one I haven't seen. I dont like the comics or movie character or Garner. But I would see it. I don't refuse to see anything 
_________________ I apologize for the above post.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Monk
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:02 am |
|
Joined: | 19 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 35552 |
Location: | Between the thumb and the wrist. |
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rawburn
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:03 am |
|
Joined: | 24 Sep 2004 |
Posts: | 13716 |
Location: | ToWANto |
Bannings: | Too ignored to be banned. |
|
Monk wrote: Superman Returns is a misunderstood masterpiece.
Except for Superman not hitting anyone. That was lame. Okay, now Superman Returns sucked donkey ass. DD was better by far.
_________________ Bigmouth strikes again!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rawburn
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:04 am |
|
Joined: | 24 Sep 2004 |
Posts: | 13716 |
Location: | ToWANto |
Bannings: | Too ignored to be banned. |
|
IMHO.
_________________ Bigmouth strikes again!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Rob Steinbrenner
|
Post subject: Batman (1989) VS Daredevil (2003) Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:04 am |
|
Joined: | 05 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 49778 |
|
It's pretty good
I retrospect, the pacings a bit off. and they should have let Routhe play Superman his way instead of telling him to give an impression of Chris Reeve doing Superman.
The biggest problem is in many ways it is a remake of the first movie. and Superman needs a physical challenege. We've seen Luthor too much. Show the impact of two superhumans battling in a city with modern effects. (to some extent Hulk did that). and show Superman horrified at said impact. That'd be like Superman II but it could be handled with more depth.
_________________ I apologize for the above post.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 6
|
[ 121 posts ] |
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Who is WANline |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|