View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Darin
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:46 pm |
|
Joined: | 14 Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 17145 |
Location: | La Crosse, WI |
Bannings: | Not as often these days. |
|
What's your least favorite Star Trek cliche or idiosyncrasy?
I think mine would be how every character in the 24th century shows reminisces about their days at the Academy ad nauseum. Real naval officers and astronauts don't do this. That was one thing I really liked about ST:ENT.
_________________ Darin Wagner
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mark
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:03 pm |
|
 |
How does
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 20170 |
Location: | Keystone City |
Bannings: | fear taste? |
|
"I'm a doctor, not a _____"
Both McCoy and Pulaski used it (though McCoy enough to be annoying, and Pulaski just being BAD imitation.
_________________ "I'm right 97% of the time. Who cares about the other 4%?"
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tuna
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:27 pm |
|
 |
Still Not A Dalmatian In A Jaunty Beret
|
Joined: | 21 Dec 2007 |
Posts: | 36135 |
Location: | Humid |
|
Women don't have what it takes to command. And they are all girls, no matter their age. ST:OS
_________________ Because Life is a Treasure Already!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mark
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:33 pm |
|
 |
How does
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 20170 |
Location: | Keystone City |
Bannings: | fear taste? |
|
Wasn't that from the last episode too? When whatsername took over Kirk's body? I thought that was stupid when I was 6.
_________________ "I'm right 97% of the time. Who cares about the other 4%?"
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Frank L. Sisko
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:04 pm |
|
 |
Emissary to the Prophets
|
Joined: | 25 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 28198 |
Location: | On the DEFIANT |
|
Mark wrote: "I'm a doctor, not a _____"
Both McCoy and Pulaski used it (though McCoy enough to be annoying, and Pulaski just being BAD imitation. Bashir only said it once, I think. The Doctor on VOYAGER said it all the time, didn't he? He definitely did in his FIRST CONTACT big-screen cameo.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Frank L. Sisko
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:08 pm |
|
 |
Emissary to the Prophets
|
Joined: | 25 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 28198 |
Location: | On the DEFIANT |
|
I rolled my eyes every time the "rule of historically significant threes" came into play. Starfleet officer X would reference two people or events from actual Earth history, and throw in a third example, some made-up reference from another planet's history and/or the future. Centauri did the same thing in THE LAST STARFIGHTER, now that I think about it: Quote: Centauri: Alex! Alex! You're walking away from history! History, Alex! Did Chris Columbus stay home? Nooooo. What if the Wright Brothers thought that only birds should fly? And did Galoka think that the Ulus were too ugly to save?
Alex Rogan: Who's Galoka?
Centauri: Never mind. That sort of thing.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tuna
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:47 pm |
|
 |
Still Not A Dalmatian In A Jaunty Beret
|
Joined: | 21 Dec 2007 |
Posts: | 36135 |
Location: | Humid |
|
And evolved beings are made of energy or angelic to behold.
And how many frickin' Earth parallels can one universe handle? Egocentric much?
_________________ Because Life is a Treasure Already!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Night Owl
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:01 pm |
|
Joined: | 26 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 26688 |
Location: | Center of the Universe. |
|
All ships must arrive at each other face up on the same plane.
Almost all ships (and characters) have a universal translator, but that translator's database is woefully lacking in Klingon and someone has to explain to the others what "that Klingon phrase" meant.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Li'l Jay
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:05 pm |
|
 |
It scorched
|
Joined: | 28 May 2006 |
Posts: | 68690 |
Bannings: | One too few . . . |
|
Mysterious planet being explored by the Captain of the ship, his first officer, and any other high ranking officers around.
On the rare occasion that a flunky is exploring the planet first, he gets smoked. Only to be followed by -- you guessed it -- the Captain of the ship going down to see what mysterious thing smoked the flunky.
_________________ Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Kevin
IMWAN Mod |
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:06 pm |
|
Joined: | 08 Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 11850 |
Location: | Georgia |
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Ocean Doot
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:17 pm |
|
 |
Dendritic Oscillating Ontological Tesseract
|
Joined: | 25 Oct 2007 |
Posts: | 51037 |
Location: | Milwaukee |
|
I've come to be annoyed when an animal is referenced that's an Earth animal (so us dumb viewers get it), but they put an alien qualifier before it to make it sound vaguely sci-fi. i.e,
"You're acting more stubborn than a Rigelian bull."
"You snore louder than a Darominnian rooster."
"She's stealthier than a Grollorian jungle cat."
Et cetera ...
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tuna
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:36 pm |
|
 |
Still Not A Dalmatian In A Jaunty Beret
|
Joined: | 21 Dec 2007 |
Posts: | 36135 |
Location: | Humid |
|
"He's dead, Jim!"
_________________ Because Life is a Treasure Already!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Night Owl
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:41 pm |
|
Joined: | 26 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 26688 |
Location: | Center of the Universe. |
|
Where the hell are those toilets anyway?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Linda
IMWAN Admin |
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:17 pm |
|
 |
Helpful Librarian
|
Joined: | Day WAN |
Posts: | 197103 |
Location: | IMWAN Towers |
Bannings: | If you're not nice |
|
That they haven't cured male pattern baldness by the 31st Century. Come on.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Simon
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:25 am |
|
 |
...
|
Joined: | 26 Oct 2006 |
Posts: | 59410 |
|
The number of times someone has their body taken over by an alien mind/presence. I always see it as the writers being lazy. There's seldom a good story to be told this way, and they tend to follow the same boring pattern. Now, of course, everyone will mention really great episodes where this happened... 
_________________ "They'll bite your finger off given a chance" - Junkie Luv (regarding Zebras)
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Frank L. Sisko
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:38 am |
|
 |
Emissary to the Prophets
|
Joined: | 25 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 28198 |
Location: | On the DEFIANT |
|
Linda wrote: That they haven't cured male pattern baldness by the 31st Century. Come on. For whatever it's worth, Pat Sajak (remember his short-lived talk show?) addressed this point when Patrick Stewart was his guest, very early in the days of NEXT GENERATION. Stewart smiled and said something like, "By the 24th century, no one will care about baldness. People will have moved beyond such pettiness." And then he ate a Twinkie.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Steve Kipling
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:22 am |
|
Joined: | 18 Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 6403 |
Location: | Canada |
|
Speaking of Picard.........He spoke with a British accent,drank Earl Grey Tea,and quoted Shakespeare ...........yet he was born in France. 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
RobertSwanderson
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:26 am |
|
 |
Bigger and Better!
|
Joined: | 01 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 52207 |
Location: | WGBS |
|
Tuna wrote: And how many frickin' Earth parallels can one universe handle? Egocentric much?
In an infinite universe, duplicate and near-duplicate Earths are a certainty.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Monk
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:27 am |
|
Joined: | 19 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 35552 |
Location: | Between the thumb and the wrist. |
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Monk
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:28 am |
|
Joined: | 19 Jun 2006 |
Posts: | 35552 |
Location: | Between the thumb and the wrist. |
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Brotoro
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:33 am |
|
 |
Friendly, Furry, Ellipsoidal
|
Joined: | 12 Apr 2008 |
Posts: | 62297 |
Location: | Brotoro's Magic Forest |
Bannings: | Bannings? We don't need no stinkin' bannings! |
|
Monk wrote: Sisko grew a Van Dyke but was not evil, even though it was clearly established that such facial hair was a clear sign of malevolence? Uh oh. I believe Monk has found the most glaring fault in the Star Trek universe.
_________________ Because life is a treasure. —Dave Powell
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Steve Kipling
|
Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:54 am |
|
Joined: | 18 Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 6403 |
Location: | Canada |
|
Monk wrote: Fraternization is allowed between crew members? Hey they allowed Seven to wear a "special" cat suit/uniform.......with heals! 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 3
|
[ 64 posts ] |
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Who is WANline |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|