“IMWAN for all seasons.”



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message

IMWAN Admin
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:16 pm 
User avatar
Helpful Librarian

Joined: Day WAN
Posts: 196967
Location: IMWAN Towers
Bannings: If you're not nice
The indicia of their Silver Age reprint books always looked sort of bizarre, with various stories appearing "courtesy of" other companies. Why was this? Weren't all the originals owned by Marvel themselves?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Image


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:39 pm 
User avatar
Ancient Alien Theorist

Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 105334
Location: The Fourth World
Bannings: 2001
Perhaps actual publishers had rights to material they printed for a certain period of time.

BTW, the person in your avatar is ridiculously adorable.


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:57 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 40603
Weren't Marvel Comics published and/or distributed by DC from the late 50's up until 1968? That arrangement may have something to do with it.


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Mod
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:31 am 
User avatar
Good Stuff, Maynard!

Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 19439
Location: N47°52.274' / W121°57.700'
Hanzo the Razor wrote:
BTW, the person in your avatar is ridiculously adorable.


Others agree.

http://www.imwan.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=16890

_________________
I'm the WAN, natural WAN, make it easy...


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:32 am 
User avatar
Bigger and Better!

Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 52207
Location: WGBS
Hank wrote:
Hanzo the Razor wrote:
BTW, the person in your avatar is ridiculously adorable.


Others agree.

http://www.imwan.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=16890


Except for Sisko.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:36 am 
User avatar
interloper

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 2995
Location: right here
I believe the Sisko only disagreed about the effects of age, not the cuteness of Flo in 1963.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:44 am 
User avatar
Bigger and Better!

Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 52207
Location: WGBS
Except for Sisko and Jim.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:02 am 
User avatar
interloper

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 2995
Location: right here
:)


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:46 pm 
User avatar
Lord of Houngon Manor

Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 2873
Location: The Diabolical Dungeon of Solitude
Bannings: Anyplace With Good Sense
Linda wrote:
The indicia of their Silver Age reprint books always looked sort of bizarre, with various stories appearing "courtesy of" other companies. Why was this? Weren't all the originals owned by Marvel themselves?


Because the character licensing was not the emphasis back then, it was on the copyright afforded to the actual "publisher" who retains a copyright to actual published version. Same reason that folks who take a public domain novel like, say, WAR OF THE WORLDS have a copyright claim to their printed "version" of it -- the physical look of it. The text itself is public domain, but the way it looks in published form is copyright to whomever does the formatting and publishing. You take their book and make xerox copies of it or scan it then you've just violated the copyright of the publisher -- even though the work itself is public domain.

Nowadays, Marvel is its own publisher, but back then it was different. As a result, if they were going to reprint something, they had to get permission of the one who owned the copyright to the actual published material. Even though Marvel itself owned copyright to the intellectual property itself.

Interesting though. Never noticed that and I was one of the uber-geeks who actually read the indicia on his comics sometimes. :)

_________________
http://profchallenger.com

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
—Aldous Huxley


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:17 am 
User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 44599
Location: Now in CHARLOTTE, NC!!
Bannings: 1
And that's why he is the Professor!

_________________
IT IS HIGH!! IT IS FAR!! IT IS GONE!!
http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryDeta ... GCat=24206
http://capcourage.deviantart.com/gallery/


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Why did Marvel have to license stories from itself?
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:24 pm 
User avatar
Emissary to the Prophets

Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 28198
Location: On the DEFIANT
Jim Yingst wrote:
I believe the Sisko only disagreed about the effects of age, not the cuteness of Flo in 1963.


Flo was indeed ridiculously cute in 1963.

And I said NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF AGE anywhere in the thread. Go back and read my posts again.

It was a bad picture. Several other people thought so, too.

Don't read too good?


Top
  Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]   



Who is WANline

Users browsing this forum: Apple [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powdered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

IMWAN is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide
a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk.