Jason Gore wrote:
The thing that makes him a villain is what makes him fail. And the nature of the flaw is such that it creates a blind spot. So he can keep failing, and not understanding the failure is in himself, not that he's getting beaten by his betters.
But after a while, arrogance in the face of persistent failure starts to look like being a bit thick. The same problem, really, as:
Quote:
I never really liked either version of Luthor - the mad scientist who wanted to beat Superman, or the Gordon Gecko style business man who just wants to ruin him. The problem being a mastermind is that sooner or later, the fact that you don't win highlights the fact that you're not that great..
That's the problem with repeating appearances of villains in serial fiction. No matter who the character or what the motivation, eventually you as a reader have to forget about what the character would "really" do, or NO villain works.