“IMWAN for all seasons.”



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  ( Next )
Author Message
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:46 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 17145
Location: La Crosse, WI
Bannings: Not as often these days.
What's your least favorite Star Trek cliche or idiosyncrasy?


I think mine would be how every character in the 24th century shows reminisces about their days at the Academy ad nauseum. Real naval officers and astronauts don't do this. That was one thing I really liked about ST:ENT.

_________________
Darin Wagner


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:03 pm 
User avatar
How does

Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 20170
Location: Keystone City
Bannings: fear taste?
"I'm a doctor, not a _____"

Both McCoy and Pulaski used it (though McCoy enough to be annoying, and Pulaski just being BAD imitation.

_________________
"I'm right 97% of the time. Who cares about the other 4%?"


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:27 pm 
User avatar
Still Not A Dalmatian In A Jaunty Beret

Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 36135
Location: Humid
Women don't have what it takes to command. And they are all girls, no matter their age. ST:OS

_________________
Because Life is a Treasure Already!


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:33 pm 
User avatar
How does

Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 20170
Location: Keystone City
Bannings: fear taste?
Wasn't that from the last episode too? When whatsername took over Kirk's body? I thought that was stupid when I was 6.

_________________
"I'm right 97% of the time. Who cares about the other 4%?"


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:04 pm 
User avatar
Emissary to the Prophets

Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 28198
Location: On the DEFIANT
Mark wrote:
"I'm a doctor, not a _____"

Both McCoy and Pulaski used it (though McCoy enough to be annoying, and Pulaski just being BAD imitation.


Bashir only said it once, I think. The Doctor on VOYAGER said it all the time, didn't he? He definitely did in his FIRST CONTACT big-screen cameo.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:08 pm 
User avatar
Emissary to the Prophets

Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 28198
Location: On the DEFIANT
I rolled my eyes every time the "rule of historically significant threes" came into play. Starfleet officer X would reference two people or events from actual Earth history, and throw in a third example, some made-up reference from another planet's history and/or the future.

Centauri did the same thing in THE LAST STARFIGHTER, now that I think about it:

Quote:
Centauri: Alex! Alex! You're walking away from history! History, Alex! Did Chris Columbus stay home? Nooooo. What if the Wright Brothers thought that only birds should fly? And did Galoka think that the Ulus were too ugly to save?

Alex Rogan: Who's Galoka?

Centauri: Never mind.


That sort of thing.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:47 pm 
User avatar
Still Not A Dalmatian In A Jaunty Beret

Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 36135
Location: Humid
And evolved beings are made of energy or angelic to behold.

And how many frickin' Earth parallels can one universe handle? Egocentric much?

_________________
Because Life is a Treasure Already!


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 26688
Location: Center of the Universe.
All ships must arrive at each other face up on the same plane.

Almost all ships (and characters) have a universal translator, but that translator's database is woefully lacking in Klingon and someone has to explain to the others what "that Klingon phrase" meant.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:05 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68690
Bannings: One too few . . .
Mysterious planet being explored by the Captain of the ship, his first officer, and any other high ranking officers around.


On the rare occasion that a flunky is exploring the planet first, he gets smoked. Only to be followed by -- you guessed it -- the Captain of the ship going down to see what mysterious thing smoked the flunky.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Mod
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:06 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 11850
Location: Georgia
You're all fake fans.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:17 pm 
User avatar
Dendritic Oscillating Ontological Tesseract

Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 51036
Location: Milwaukee
I've come to be annoyed when an animal is referenced that's an Earth animal (so us dumb viewers get it), but they put an alien qualifier before it to make it sound vaguely sci-fi. i.e,

"You're acting more stubborn than a Rigelian bull."

"You snore louder than a Darominnian rooster."

"She's stealthier than a Grollorian jungle cat."

Et cetera ...


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:36 pm 
User avatar
Still Not A Dalmatian In A Jaunty Beret

Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 36135
Location: Humid
"He's dead, Jim!"

_________________
Because Life is a Treasure Already!


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:41 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 26688
Location: Center of the Universe.
Where the hell are those toilets anyway?


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Admin
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:17 pm 
User avatar
Helpful Librarian

Joined: Day WAN
Posts: 197101
Location: IMWAN Towers
Bannings: If you're not nice
That they haven't cured male pattern baldness by the 31st Century. Come on.

_________________
Image


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:25 am 
User avatar
...

Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 59410
The number of times someone has their body taken over by an alien mind/presence. I always see it as the writers being lazy. There's seldom a good story to be told this way, and they tend to follow the same boring pattern.

Now, of course, everyone will mention really great episodes where this happened... :lol:

_________________
"They'll bite your finger off given a chance" - Junkie Luv (regarding Zebras)


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:38 am 
User avatar
Emissary to the Prophets

Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 28198
Location: On the DEFIANT
Linda wrote:
That they haven't cured male pattern baldness by the 31st Century. Come on.


For whatever it's worth, Pat Sajak (remember his short-lived talk show?) addressed this point when Patrick Stewart was his guest, very early in the days of NEXT GENERATION. Stewart smiled and said something like, "By the 24th century, no one will care about baldness. People will have moved beyond such pettiness."

And then he ate a Twinkie.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:22 am 
User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 6403
Location: Canada
Speaking of Picard.........He spoke with a British accent,drank Earl Grey Tea,and quoted Shakespeare ...........yet he was born in France. :?


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:26 am 
User avatar
Bigger and Better!

Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 52207
Location: WGBS
Tuna wrote:

And how many frickin' Earth parallels can one universe handle? Egocentric much?


In an infinite universe, duplicate and near-duplicate Earths are a certainty.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:27 am 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
The ship's counselor has a seat on the bridge and is apparently part of the command crew?

Fraternization is allowed between crew members?

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:28 am 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
Sisko grew a Van Dyke but was not evil, even though it was clearly established that such facial hair was a clear sign of malevolence?

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:33 am 
User avatar
Friendly, Furry, Ellipsoidal

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 62297
Location: Brotoro's Magic Forest
Bannings: Bannings? We don't need no stinkin' bannings!
Monk wrote:
Sisko grew a Van Dyke but was not evil, even though it was clearly established that such facial hair was a clear sign of malevolence?


Uh oh. I believe Monk has found the most glaring fault in the Star Trek universe.

_________________
Because life is a treasure. —Dave Powell


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Star Trek cliches idiosyncrasies
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:54 am 
User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 6403
Location: Canada
Monk wrote:
Fraternization is allowed between crew members?


Hey they allowed Seven to wear a "special" cat suit/uniform.......with heals! :love1:


Top
  Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Go to page 1, 2, 3  ( Next )
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]   



Who is WANline

Users browsing this forum: Li'l Jay, Roger Stern and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powdered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

IMWAN is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide
a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk.