View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Mahoney
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:21 pm |
|
 |
Champion of Everything
|
Joined: | 02 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 13983 |
Location: | On Patrol |
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44629271/ns ... -particle/Quote: GENEVA — Scientists at the world's largest physics lab say they have clocked subatomic particles traveling faster than light, a feat that — if true — would break a fundamental pillar of science.
The readings have so astounded researchers that they are asking others to independently verify the measurements before claiming an actual discovery.
"This would be such a sensational discovery if it were true that one has to treat it extremely carefully," said John Ellis, a theoretical physicist at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, who was not involved in the experiment.
Nothing is supposed to move faster than light, at least according to Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity: The famous E (equals) mc2 equation. That stands for energy equals mass times the speed of light squared.
But neutrinos — one of the strangest well-known particles in physics — have now been observed smashing past this cosmic speed barrier of 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers).
CERN says a neutrino beam fired from a particle accelerator near Geneva to a lab 454 miles (730 kilometers) away in Italy traveled 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light. Scientists calculated the margin of error at just 10 nanoseconds, making the difference statistically significant. But given the enormity of the find, they still spent months checking and rechecking their results to make sure there were no flaws in the experiment.
The CERN researchers are now looking to the United States and Japan to confirm the results.
A similar neutrino experiment at Fermilab near Chicago would be capable of running the tests, said Stavros Katsanevas, the deputy director of France's National Institute for Nuclear and Particle Physics Research.
Katsanevas, who participated in the CERN experiment, said help could also come from the T2K experiment in Japan, though that is currently on hold after the country's devastating earthquake and tsunami in March.
Scientists agree that if the results are confirmed, it would force a fundamental rethink of the laws of nature, starting with the special theory of relativity proposed by Einstein in 1905.
Special relativity, which helps explain everything from black holes to the Big Bang theory about the origins of the universe, underlies "pretty much everything in modern physics," Ellis said. "It has worked perfectly up until now."
He cautioned that the neutrino researchers also would have to explain why similar results weren't detected before, such as when an exploding star — or supernova — was observed in 1987. Pretty amazing if true. Wonder what this will mean long term?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:23 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
I've always thought the faster than light being impossible crap to be incredibly arbitrary. There was never any proof to it whatsoever, yet so many scientists have held it as gospel truth.
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Li'l Jay
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:27 pm |
|
 |
It scorched
|
Joined: | 28 May 2006 |
Posts: | 68690 |
Bannings: | One too few . . . |
|
Nice going, Einstein.
_________________ Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
RobertSwanderson
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:28 pm |
|
 |
Bigger and Better!
|
Joined: | 01 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 52207 |
Location: | WGBS |
|
Once again, "science" is full of shit.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:31 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
That is really not the lesson here. If science were truly full of shit these scientists would be trying to rationalize this new information with Einstein's earlier hypothesis. Instead, they just said he was wrong and as such have moved science forward.
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Li'l Jay
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:32 pm |
|
 |
It scorched
|
Joined: | 28 May 2006 |
Posts: | 68690 |
Bannings: | One too few . . . |
|
Bubbles wrote: That is really not the lesson here. If science were truly full of shit these scientists would be trying to rationalize this new information with Einstein's earlier hypothesis. Which, by the way, they will do, and we will learn Einstein was correct. (Just playing the percentages -- it's very likely.  )
_________________ Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:33 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
Someone will certainly try to do that. That person will likely be a bad scientist at best, or an outright moron at worst.
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Brotoro
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:34 pm |
|
 |
Friendly, Furry, Ellipsoidal
|
Joined: | 12 Apr 2008 |
Posts: | 62295 |
Location: | Brotoro's Magic Forest |
Bannings: | Bannings? We don't need no stinkin' bannings! |
|
Einstein was wrong. Or the experimenters made a mistake. I await verification by other experimenters.
_________________ Because life is a treasure. —Dave Powell
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:37 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
By the way, this is hardy the first time Einstein has been wrong. Einstein thought that the Universe was contracting, we now know (or at least with a fair amount of certainty suspect) that the Universe is in fact expanding. The great thing about science is that proving someone wrong is never a bad thing.
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:38 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
Unless of course you were to prove someone wrong who thought the world was not about to blow up, that would be a bad thing.
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Brotoro
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:39 pm |
|
 |
Friendly, Furry, Ellipsoidal
|
Joined: | 12 Apr 2008 |
Posts: | 62295 |
Location: | Brotoro's Magic Forest |
Bannings: | Bannings? We don't need no stinkin' bannings! |
|
Bubbles wrote: By the way, this is hardy the first time Einstein has been wrong. Einstein thought that the Universe was contracting, we now know (or at least with a fair amount of certainty suspect) that the Universe is in fact expanding. The great thing about science is that proving someone wrong is never a bad thing. No. Einstein was TOLD by astronomers of his day that the universe was static. So he added a cosmological constant to his equations to make things come out static (since his equations indicated that the universe would NOT be static otherwise).
_________________ Because life is a treasure. —Dave Powell
|
|
Top |
|
 |
(T)Eddy
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:42 pm |
|
 |
Hold yourself together, (T)Eddy----it's only IMWAN
|
Joined: | 02 Jul 2009 |
Posts: | 11767 |
|
In James Blish's Spock Must Die or some other sci-fi book, I read that the reason faster-than-light particles like tachyons travel faster than the speed of light is because they never slow down. Other particles can't travel fast enough to approach the speed of light, but tachyons can't slow down to light's speed, but instead travel faster and faster.
That is either one of the most ingenius quasi-scientific explanations or one of the dumbest.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Li'l Jay
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:45 pm |
|
 |
It scorched
|
Joined: | 28 May 2006 |
Posts: | 68690 |
Bannings: | One too few . . . |
|
Bubbles wrote: Someone will certainly try to do that. That person will likely be a bad scientist at best, or an outright moron at worst. Not necessarily. The possibility of reconciling the observed results with Einstein should be thoroughly investigated. It's nothing more than preserving Einstein's theory, and then considering other explanations for the observed result. It's just as bad to quickly conclude Einstein was wrong and go from there. (Although each position has to be adopted provisionally in order to set up experiments and test).
_________________ Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Steve
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:57 pm |
|
 |
What do you call a camel with three humps?
|
Joined: | 21 Oct 2004 |
Posts: | 58174 |
Location: | Indiana |
|
I don't want to talk to a scientist. Motherfuckers lyin' and gettin' me pissed.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
RobertSwanderson
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:00 pm |
|
 |
Bigger and Better!
|
Joined: | 01 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 52207 |
Location: | WGBS |
|
So we've been not going faster than the speed of light because this Einstein guy told us we couldn't.
Sounds like the flat Earth thing all over again.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Brotoro
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:01 pm |
|
 |
Friendly, Furry, Ellipsoidal
|
Joined: | 12 Apr 2008 |
Posts: | 62295 |
Location: | Brotoro's Magic Forest |
Bannings: | Bannings? We don't need no stinkin' bannings! |
|
You are welcome to go faster than the speed of light if you have a method for doing so. Don't let Einstein stop you.
_________________ Because life is a treasure. —Dave Powell
|
|
Top |
|
 |
RobertSwanderson
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:08 pm |
|
 |
Bigger and Better!
|
Joined: | 01 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 52207 |
Location: | WGBS |
|
Brotoro wrote: You are welcome to go faster than the speed of light if you have a method for doing so. Don't let Einstein stop you. I found a vehicle, but Steven Wright has me afraid to turn on the headlights.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mahoney
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:15 pm |
|
 |
Champion of Everything
|
Joined: | 02 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 13983 |
Location: | On Patrol |
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:36 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
Brotoro wrote: Bubbles wrote: By the way, this is hardy the first time Einstein has been wrong. Einstein thought that the Universe was contracting, we now know (or at least with a fair amount of certainty suspect) that the Universe is in fact expanding. The great thing about science is that proving someone wrong is never a bad thing. No. Einstein was TOLD by astronomers of his day that the universe was static. So he added a cosmological constant to his equations to make things come out static (since his equations indicated that the universe would NOT be static otherwise). I guess that's what I get for taking at his word what some semi-annoying kid rambled on about in High School just because he was one of the "smart kids."
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:39 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
Li'l Jay wrote: Bubbles wrote: Someone will certainly try to do that. That person will likely be a bad scientist at best, or an outright moron at worst. Not necessarily. The possibility of reconciling the observed results with Einstein should be thoroughly investigated. It's nothing more than preserving Einstein's theory, and then considering other explanations for the observed result. It's just as bad to quickly conclude Einstein was wrong and go from there. (Although each position has to be adopted provisionally in order to set up experiments and test). True. Although as I have already said the whole nothing can travel faster than light has never been proven at all and at least to this layman has always seemed totally arbitrary in the first place.
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Brotoro
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:51 pm |
|
 |
Friendly, Furry, Ellipsoidal
|
Joined: | 12 Apr 2008 |
Posts: | 62295 |
Location: | Brotoro's Magic Forest |
Bannings: | Bannings? We don't need no stinkin' bannings! |
|
Bubbles wrote: Li'l Jay wrote: Bubbles wrote: Someone will certainly try to do that. That person will likely be a bad scientist at best, or an outright moron at worst. Not necessarily. The possibility of reconciling the observed results with Einstein should be thoroughly investigated. It's nothing more than preserving Einstein's theory, and then considering other explanations for the observed result. It's just as bad to quickly conclude Einstein was wrong and go from there. (Although each position has to be adopted provisionally in order to set up experiments and test). True. Although as I have already said the whole nothing can travel faster than light has never been proven at all and at least to this layman has always seemed totally arbitrary in the first place. Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity tells us that the mass of a particle will increase as its speed increases.  If this equation is true, then the energy of a body with mass would have to go to infinity as you increase its velocity to the speed of light (let alone faster). Since we don't have infinite amounts of energy available to accelerate particles, we can't get any particle with mass up to the speed of light. I have verified that the equation works in an undergraduate Physics lab where we sent electrons traveling at different speeds into a magnetic field to see how much their paths bent (since that is related to the mass of the particle). The equation has been verified to velocities much closer to the speed of light (when CERN accelerates particles in their accelerators, they have to constantly adjust the magnetic field strength to account for the increased mass of the particles they are speeding up). So this speed limit is not just some arbitrary concept. The theory has been tested many times.
_________________ Because life is a treasure. —Dave Powell
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Einstein was wrong? (Faster than light possible?) Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:56 pm |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
Well then. Looks like I have been wrong twice in one thread. And you know what? I'm okay with that. 
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 2
|
[ 39 posts ] |
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Who is WANline |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|