Monk wrote:
Frank may mock me for saying this, but grammar is like math to me. When confronted with rules and instructions about it, my brain just locks up. Obviously, I'll need to get past that eventually.
I don't think so - you instinctively write correctly when you are someone who has read a great deal (See, I know that that should be 'one' and I don't care) So why do you need to 'get past it'? Writing, in fiction anyway, needs to be lively and engaging, to construct believable characters and situations, to convey excitement, pathos and drama: sort those things out, THEN do a grammar check if you are in any doubt.
Many, many published authors write sentences that a pedant might condemn as 'ungrammatical' but whose meaning is perfectly clear and precise: but then, English has so many arbitrary and useless rules, confusing and arcane requirements (split infinitive - so fucking what? I am not writing Latin) and all the rest of it that it often does little good to worry overmuch about 'correct' or not. Of course you have to be careful not to make foolish errors, but write from your heart first.
This has been a public information message from the Campaign for Realistic Attention to Punctuation, or CRAP.