“IMWAN for all seasons.”



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 249 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  ( Next )
Author Message
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:13 am 
User avatar
I love Music & hate brickwalled audio

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 37646
Location: The Pasture
I had in store only gift certs for both BB & Borders so I went shopping today. Of the 10-15 cd's i was looking for, the only one BB had was Neil Young Massey & it was over priced. I was a bit surprised to see that BB was carrying some Japanese mini lp sleeves, though! They also no longer had Sly boxes with the DVD, just cd only.

Borders wasn't much better. They had the Neil Young Massey cd/dvd on sale for $20 which was the amount of my gift cert so I grabbed it. The only other cd Borders had from my list was the remastered Excitable Boy, but they wanted $19 for it (ouch).

This is what replaced Tower. No wonder I do my shopping on the internet & at Pawn Shops.......

_________________
Putty Cats are God's gift to the universe.


Top
  Profile  
 

ICE Mod
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:37 am 
User avatar
The Last Hippie

Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 28441
Location: Ohio
and my borders has cut their CD inventory by a fourth!

renny

_________________
Incorrectly is the only word that when spelled correctly is still spelled incorrectly.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:11 pm 
User avatar
Iconoclast

Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 4543
And Borders got rid of Borders Blend coffee and replaced it with that Starbucks crap (oh, excuse me, it's not Starbucks, it's Seattles Best, which is supposed to be completely different from Starbucks even though Starbucks owns it...)

I hate to say it, but I'm finding that my default store in Sarasota for CD's and DVD's these days tends to be the Best Buy. As Best Buy stores go (and this isn't saying much) the Sarasota Best Buy is a pretty good Best Buy.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:57 pm 
User avatar
I love Music & hate brickwalled audio

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 37646
Location: The Pasture
My Borders cut their cd inventory more like 2/3 a few months back.

Seattle's Best at least USED TO have a totally different flavor then Starbucks........

_________________
Putty Cats are God's gift to the universe.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 4614
Location: Tampa to Tennessee
We have a couple of Borders in my area. One also cut their CD inventory back, apparently to make way for more stationary and diary-type products. Strangely, the other store seems to have about the same amount as they always did ... so far. Of course, unless something is on sale they are way overpriced.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:10 pm 
User avatar
I love Music & hate brickwalled audio

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 37646
Location: The Pasture
1 (& 1/2) More Reasons To Hate Best Buy:

I've never seen this before in my life, but bb refuses to accept payments in store for their own Best Buy credit card. Grr.....

Reason 1/2: After (not) paying the bill for my sister's laptop, I was going to use my $10 rewards coupon on the $11.99 Jefferson Airplane Sweeping Up cd (opposite to making payments on their in house card, the rewards coupon is only good in store). Guess what they were out of........ the Airplane section consisted on Surrealistic (non remaster) & Volunteers (remaster) + 2 Starship titles.

Sad, I've had that $10 rewards coupon for over a month & this is my 3rd unsuccessful attempt to find ANYTHING TO USE IT ON. There's no point in using it on something that would still be cheaper at BMG even with the $10 off.

GRRRRRRR

_________________
Putty Cats are God's gift to the universe.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 40603
Geff R. wrote:
I've never seen this before in my life, but bb refuses to accept payments in store for their own Best Buy credit card. Grr.....


That's actually quite common with credit cards. Most cards are financed by a bank (or other financial institution) and not by whatever company's name is on the card itself.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:43 pm 
User avatar
I love Music & hate brickwalled audio

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 37646
Location: The Pasture
None of my other store branded cards (in the USA) have this issue. I don't disagree with your statementt that other banks own most of the cards, but I do dispute the P-poor customer service which seems ro be limited to Best Buy. I'm pretty much down to only buying exclusive cd's from them in the future.

_________________
Putty Cats are God's gift to the universe.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:52 am 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 10789
Location: Irvine, CA
from courant.com--

George Gombossy: Consumer Watchdog


Lawsuit: Best Buy Cheated Shoppers
May 25, 2007

In a move that could result in millions of dollars in penalties and refunds, Connecticut officials have sued Best Buy, accusing the giant electronics retailer of deceiving and cheating its customers using a secret in-store computer network.

Consumer Protection Commissioner Jerry Farrell Jr. said Thursday that he believes the suit will result in a "multimillion dollar case" against the Minnesota-based chain, which has 10 outlets in Connecticut.

Farrell said he and state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal offered to settle the case for several million dollars, but Best Buy, insisting it did not do anything to warrant such punishment, refused the offer.

The suit was filed last week in Hartford Superior Court, alleging violations of state unfair trade practices laws.

Farrell said he doesn't think Best Buy fully understands the amount of potential damages it faces under Connecticut laws, which call for $5,000 in fines for each time a customer is cheated. Officials were unable to provide data on how many complaints have been received so far.

State officials launched their investigation after a Feb. 9 Watchdog column disclosed that Best Buy stores had a secret intranet site in its stores - one that mirrored the public BestBuy.com Internet site, but with different pricing. The intranet prices usually reflected the individual store's prices, not the public Internet prices, which Best Buy since 2005 has promised to honor.

Since publication of the Feb. 9 Watchdog column, and subsequent columns on the subject, hundreds of Best Buy customers have complained to The Courant about being charged higher-than-advertised prices. They said they looked up sales on bestbuy.com, but when they went into stores, clerks would show them a bestbuy.com site that had a price other than the sales price. Customers were told that the sale apparently was over, or that they had misread the advertisement.

In reality, the salesman was accessing an intranet website that was almost identical to the public site. According to current and former employees and managers, some workers knew they were misleading customers, while other employees were unaware of the duplicate site.

Best Buy officials have denied that the in-store intranet site was devised to confuse employees or customers. On Thursday, they said the intranet site was set up only to let people know what was available in the stores, not to deceive customers. Only a small percentage of customers were adversely affected, they said.

"Once this issue was brought to our attention, we provided immediate training for our employees to help ensure that all customers received the best price. We are in the process of making changes to eliminate future confusion" company spokeswoman Susan Busch said in a prepared release.

"Further details about this matter must be saved for courtroom; however, I can tell you that we intend to vigorously defend ourselves. The future of our company depends on our ability to build trusted relationships with our customers. Our goal is to provide our customers with the products and services that best meet their individual needs."

Blumenthal said Thursday that he doesn't buy the company's explanation and that he expects other states to file their own lawsuits against Best Buy or join his suit.

"Best Buy gave consumers the worst deal: a bait-and-switch-plus scheme luring consumers into stores with promised online discounts, only to charge higher in-store prices," he said. "Best Buy treated its customers like suckers, not patrons to be prized."

Farrell added, "It is extremely unfortunate that this company misled consumers as to what the `best buy' actually was."

In reaction to the Watchdog column and the state investigation, Best Buy in March added a banner to its in-store website that says: "This Kiosk Reflects Local Store Pricing." But Blumenthal and Farrell said the kiosks remain deceptive because their appearance remains virtually identical to BestBuy.com, and customers still access information by clicking a tab marked "BestBuy.com."

Best Buy customers across the country sent e-mails to The Courant complaining of employees who refused to honor Internet Best Buy prices.

They also have complained of other problems, such as receiving used merchandise that was supposed to be new, being tricked into purchasing unnecessary computer software, purchasing defective products and failing to receive promised rebates and rain checks. Blumenthal said his office is investigating similar complaints.

Best Buy employees and former employees also wrote to the Watchdog complaining about being pressured to sell merchandise and costly warranties. Best Buy advertises that its salespeople are not paid on commission, but employees said the number of hours part-time salespeople are called to work depends on the sales and profits they make for the chain.

Best Buy, based in Minneapolis, operates more than 1,100 electronic retail stores in the U.S., Canada and China. It has more than 125,000 full-time employees.

This is not the first time the electronics retailer has been accused of misleading customers. Attorneys general in New Jersey and Ohio have accused Best Buy of deceptive sales practices, repackaging used merchandise and selling it as new, and failing to pay rebates and refunds. The company paid $135,000 in New Jersey three years ago to settle that state's suit, which was based on hundreds of consumer complaints. The Ohio case is ongoing.


http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-wa ... lity-local


Additional story links:

Blumenthal targets Best Buy--
http://www.courant.com/news/local/hcu-w ... 161.column

Best Buy confirms it has secret website--
http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-wa ... 012.column


Last edited by stevef on Fri May 25, 2007 6:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 6:11 am 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 10789
Location: Irvine, CA
also...


from Associated Press story--

Best Buy Accused of Overcharging

Thursday May 24, 6:36 pm ET
By Stephanie Reitz, Associated Press Writer

Connecticut Attorney General Accuses Best Buy of Deceiving and Overcharging Customers

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- Connecticut's attorney general announced a lawsuit Thursday against Best Buy Co. Inc., accusing the nation's largest consumer electronics retailer of deceiving customers with in-store computer kiosks and overcharging them.

The lawsuit accuses Best Buy of denying deals found at the company's Web site, http://www.BestBuy.com. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said store employees charged customers higher prices found on a lookalike internal Web site.

"Best Buy gave consumers the worst deal -- a bait-and-switch-plus scheme luring consumers into stores with promised online discounts, only to charge higher in-store prices," Blumenthal said.

The complaint was dated May 18 to be served on the company, which must respond by June 13. The lawsuit, which seeks refunds for consumers, civil penalties, court costs, a ban on the practice and other remedies, would then be filed in Hartford Superior Court.

The company strongly denied Blumenthal's allegations and said the in-store kiosks provided customers with another way to get information about products and let them know what was available at that particular store.

"We used the same Web site platform for these in-store kiosks as we did for our national Web site," Best Buy spokeswoman Susan Busch said in a statement. "We did this to ensure that customers familiar with the national Web site could easily navigate the in-store kiosk."

She said a small percentage of customers did not receive the best prices from kiosks when they should have.

"Once this issue was brought to our attention, we provided immediate training for our employees to help ensure that all customers received the best price," Busch said. "We are in the process of making changes to eliminate future confusion."

Blumenthal opened an investigation into the Richfield, Minn.-based retailer in March. About 20 customers complained to his office after a columnist for The Hartford Courant reported the experience of one Connecticut man who found a laptop computer advertised for $729.99 on BestBuy.com, then went to a Best Buy store where an employee who seemed to check the same Web site told him the price was actually $879.99.

"There may be people who are entirely unaware they may have been overcharged," Blumenthal said.

Previously, the company confirmed that store employees have access to an internal Web site that looks nearly identical to the public BestBuy.com site, but the company's policy is always to offer customers the lowest quoted price unless it's specifically identified as a deal available only to online shoppers.

Jerry Farrell Jr., Connecticut's consumer protection commissioner, said the lawsuit should be a warning to companies to be more transparent in their business practices.

"There certainly was an element of deception here," Farrell said. "There certainly was an element of creating consumer confusion here."

Busch, Best Buy's spokeswoman, said the company intends to vigorously defend itself in court.

"The future of our company depends on our ability to build trusted relationships with our customers," Busch said.


http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070524/best_buy ... ation.html


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:29 pm 
User avatar
Iconoclast

Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 4543
I'm surprised that Best Buy actually has employees intelligent enough to be able to defraud customers.

Seriously though--Wal-Mart (in Florida, anyway) has ALWAYS refused to honor their internet prices in-store, and when I've spoken to Wal-Mart management about this, they have stated that it is Wal-Mart policy--and that is legal. Does Wal-Mart do this in Connecticut?


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:25 pm 
User avatar
I love Music & hate brickwalled audio

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 37646
Location: The Pasture
There's also an ongoing class action lawsuit in Washington State where BB is acused of signing customers up for MSN without their knowledge. Latest chapter: BB's lawyers altered some documents & emails & the judge is not pleased........

Best Buy on judge’s last nerve

GENE JOHNSON; The Associated Press
Published: June 6th, 2007 01:00 AM

A lawyer for Best Buy Co. has acknowledged that he falsified e-mails and a memo before turning them over to plaintiffs in a nationwide class-action lawsuit – a development that could prompt the judge to find the company liable for tens of millions of dollars in damages.

King County Superior Court Judge Douglass North previously has scolded Best Buy for not being forthcoming with documents related to the case, so last month’s revelations about the actions of Minneapolis attorney Timothy Block do not bode well for the company.

The lawsuit, filed in 2003, accuses Best Buy of signing up at least 100,000 customers for trial subscriptions to Microsoft Corp.’s MSN Internet service from 1999 to 2003, in many cases without their knowledge. Once the trial period ended, the customers began incurring credit card charges they had not approved.

Microsoft, which paid Best Buy for each customer it signed up, is accused of allowing Best Buy’s practice to continue even after receiving complaints. The lawsuit aims to hold Best Buy, Microsoft or both financially liable. If the judge enters a default judgment against Best Buy, Microsoft would essentially be off the hook, said Beth Terrell, a Seattle-based attorney for the plaintiffs.

For now, the case has been stayed while Best Buy finds new outside counsel. Block’s firm, the prominent Minneapolis firm of Robins, Kaplan, Miller and Ciresi, asked to withdraw after he admitted May 23 to redacting or otherwise altering the documents. A hearing on the withdrawal motion is set for June 22.

“Mr. Block confirmed that no other person at RKMC, and no person at Best Buy, were aware that he had changed documents,” the firm said in a court filing the next day. “RKMC has begun its investigation into the number of documents that were altered and is attempting to locate the original (pre-alteration) documents.”

Block is on medical leave for stress and depression, said his attorney, Richard Thomas.

The altered documents are limited to two e-mails and one memo, Thomas said. The documents have not been publicly released.

Asked why Block falsified the documents, Thomas said, “I don’t know that even he can tell you that. … I don’t think he is going to claim his actions were motivated by Best Buy.”

But given the extent of Best Buy’s foot-dragging regarding document production in the case, Terrell and another attorney for the plaintiffs, Dan Girard of San Francisco, wondered aloud whether Block felt pressured by the company to withhold or redact documents that could prove damaging. A senior partner at Block’s firm, Elliott Kaplan, is a director at Best Buy.

Steven Schumeister, managing partner at Robins Kaplan, said it is clearly a case of individual wrongdoing by someone going through a difficult time.

Best Buy spokeswoman Dawn Bryant emphasized that the company “had absolutely no knowledge of the inappropriate and unethical actions the attorney took.”

At a hearing in March, the judge scolded Best Buy and its lawyers for failing to follow orders directing them to turn over documents requested by the plaintiffs. North said he was hoping to avoid entering a default judgment against the company, but that he would have little choice if Best Buy didn’t start playing ball.

“I don’t know and I don’t really care at this point whether it’s you, some functionary in your firm, or your legal team, but I do know that somebody in your camp is interfering with discovery in this case,” North said, according to a transcript.

_________________
Putty Cats are God's gift to the universe.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:55 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 4614
Location: Tampa to Tennessee
In my mail today (November 8th) was a colorful mailer from Best Buy promoting an "Exclusive Sales Event" with enclosed coupons for everything from music to major appliances. Only one problem: the coupons were good for last weekend, November 2-5. Oops...


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 4614
Location: Tampa to Tennessee
For what it's worth, Best Buy sent me an e-mail stating that there was an error, with downloadable coupons good until the 12th.


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Admin
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 8:11 pm 
User avatar
Helpful Librarian

Joined: Day WAN
Posts: 197031
Location: IMWAN Towers
Bannings: If you're not nice
Quote:
Best Buy Continues to Operate Bogus In-store Website

Those looking to score the lowest prices on items at Best Buy brick and mortar (B&M) stores apparently are still having problems thanks to the company's internal website.

Customers who shop Best Buy's website often come across deals only to find that the items are sold out or on backorder. The site then often directs customers to proceed to the local store to purchase the item (usually denying customers the option to buy online with in-store pickup).

At first glance, this doesn't seem like such a bad idea: 1) the customer can receive the same price at the store and 2) the customer doesn't have to wait for shipping or pay shipping charges by picking up the item from a local Best Buy store. The problem, however, comes from the fact that Best Buy continues to operate an internal BestBuy.com website at its B&M stores that shows higher pricing than the "official" Best Buy website.

"I took [the Kodak EasyShare EX1011] to a different station and asked them to price check it, and it came up at $255.99, well over the $234.49 that was listed online," said one tipster for The Consumerist. "We went to one of their public computer terminals and searched it and it came up at the $255.99, no surprise."

Not one to kneel down and admit defeat, the tipster pressed forward in order to receive the merchandise at the $234.99 price.

"iPhone to the rescue. At first it was showing the $255 price on my iPhones browser, then I realized it was connected through WiFi, so they have it blocking the external Best Buy site and feeding the fake one. I disabled WiFi and searched again and bam, there it was, $234.99," the tipster continued. "The electronics department said I had to go to customer service for such a thing, and they promptly took care of the price change."

The news of the continued operation of Best Buy's internal website with higher prices may come as a shock to some considering the lawsuit brought against the company by Connecticut attorney general Richard Blumenthal.

A Best Buy spokeswoman noted in May of this year that the company was in the process of making changes to eliminate the pricing discrepancies between Best Buy's website and the internal Best Buy site. "We provided immediate training for our employees to help ensure that all customers received the best price," said Best Buy spokeswoman Susan Busch in late May. "We are in the process of making changes to eliminate future confusion."

It appears that Best Buy's efforts to change its internal website are progressing a bit slower than initially thought.

"We thought Best Buy had addressed this," said Blumenthal to the LA Times. "That's what they said to us. Apparently that's not the case."

Best Buy recently made headlines for its stellar fiscal 2008 Q3 performance. The company saw its overall quarterly profits rise 17 percent thanks to hot items including flat-panel TVs, notebook computers and GPS units.

Best Buy's market dominance has come at the expense of one of its closest rivals: CompUSA. CompUSA recently announced that it will close all of its remaining 103 stores at the start of 2008.

http://www.dailytech.com/Best+Buy+Conti ... e10132.htm

_________________
Image


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Admin
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:09 am 
User avatar
Helpful Librarian

Joined: Day WAN
Posts: 197031
Location: IMWAN Towers
Bannings: If you're not nice
Quote:
Woman Sues Best Buy For $54M Over Lost Laptop

The saga of one crazy suit began with Best Buy customer Raelyn Campbell's purchase of a laptop computer from a local Best Buy store in the D.C. area. A Best Buy staffer talked her into buying a $300 extended warranty. The warranty includes coverage by Best Buy's service technicians -- "Geek Squad" -- for three years, and replacements of defective hardware free of charge.

Her laptop indeed experienced hardware malfunctions within a year when her on/off switch broke. At that point, Campbell breathed a sigh of relief that she purchased the warranty and took her laptop in to Best Buy. She turned in her laptop in May and was told that it would be up and running within two to six weeks. This was a major inconvenience to her, as she was a frequent business traveler, but she figured she just should stay optimistic that it came as soon as possible.

In July an 'Agent David Goodfellow’ told Campbell that the laptop would be "ready within days". A call several days later informed her that the laptop was not ready, and was in fact still at the repair center. The rest of the month concluded with continued assurances that it was going to leave the repair center in no time.

By August, she returned from a business trip to Asia and still had heard no new word from Best Buy. Feeling concerned she called the store and asked to speak to the manager. She was told the manager was in a meeting, so she left a message. Her phone call was never returned. She eventually tried calling again and another employee 'Cicero' listened to her story and searched the store records, and informed her that he discovered that "[The laptop] never appears to have left the store."

A few days later he called her back and informed her that it appeared that the laptop was lost in store, without ever having been shipped out. While Campbell says that 'Cicero' was considerate and helpful, she was extremely angry that the other store employees had been apparently outright lying to her.

While 'Cicero' promised that he'd try to get the store to compensate her, nothing happened. After weeks of calling, Campbell was finally informed that she could accept a $900 dollar gift card, far less than the $1,100 she paid for the laptop and $300 she paid for the warranty. Angered and insulted, she wrote a frustrated letter to Best Buy's management detailing the situation, on August 24. She rejected the offer and demanded $2,100 in cash.

Best Buy outright refused her demands and she heard nothing from them by October. So Campbell told her friends and family members to write Best Buy and complain. Her friends did and received a surprising response from the store's general manager, Robert Delissio in the form of a surly email. In the email Delissio stated, "For every customer that has had an unpleasant experience I can show you hundreds who have had a great experience. I have been in retail for a long time and the one conclusion I have come to is that not every customer can be satisfied. Does my store have opportunities? Absolutely! What I can say is that we strive to deliver the experience that every customer deserves to receive."

Further infuriated, Campbell contacted the Washington, D.C., attorney general's office, who contacted the store. The store caved a bit and offered her an increased offer of $1,100 credit refund and a $500 gift card.

That's when Campbell discovered that her identity could be at risk due to private documents she stored on the computer. Shocked and infuriated with Best Buy's lack of helpfulness, she found a lawyer and filed a $54 million dollar lawsuit against Best Buy for losing her property and opening her to identity theft.

Best Buy has since upped their offer to Campbell to $2,500 cash if she signed a confidentiality agreement. Campbell refused. She says she realizes she probably won't win a multi-million dollar settlement, but she does want substantial damages for store negligence and an honest "explanation as to how my computer could have been stolen from a secure area" within the store. She also demands a company promise that they will institute training for their employees on identity theft issues.

Campbell admitted a major goal of the suit is to draw attention, to what she feel is atrocious customer service. Campbell strongly believes in this role as a legal champion, stating, "I can't help but wonder how many other people have had their computer stolen (or) lost by Best Buy and then been bullied into accepting lowball compensation offers for replacement expenses and no compensation for identity theft protection expenses."

Best Buy's legal representatives have refused to comment on the case.

http://www.dailytech.com/Woman+Sues+Bes ... e10665.htm

_________________
Image


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:19 am 
User avatar
Iconoclast

Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 4543
Wow--I wonder if this Robert Delissio character is the same guy whom Home Depot placed on administrative leave about a year and a half ago in another retail scandal that provoked a class-action lawsuit:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09072006/bu ... kapner.htm

http://securities.stanford.edu/1036/HD_ ... 061151.pdf

"Home Depot has fired two mid-level managers and placed two store managers on administrative leave after questioning the four as part of an ongoing internal investigation into allegations of improper vendor chargebacks...

The issue of whether Home Depot overcharged vendors to cover the cost of damaged or defective merchandise has attracted the scrutiny of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is informally investigating the retailer's practices.

On Tuesday, Home Depot fired Lonny Holmes, the loss-prevention manager for the Mid-Atlantic region, and Kevin Long, the region's district manager. Natasha Williams, manager of the Hyattsville, Md., store, and ROBERT DELISSIO, manager of a store in Washington, D.C.'s Brentwood neighborhood, remain on administrative leave and continue to receive a salary from Home Depot.

Holmes and Delissio declined to comment. Long could not be reached..."


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:15 pm 
User avatar
I have no fear of this machine

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 8297
Does Geek Squad still work exclusively for Best Buy? I swear I saw one of their vehicles outside a Circuit City last week...


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:26 pm 
User avatar
I have no fear of this machine

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 8297
Linda wrote:
Quote:
Best Buy Continues to Operate Bogus In-store Website

Those looking to score the lowest prices on items at Best Buy brick and mortar (B&M) stores apparently are still having problems thanks to the company's internal website.

Customers who shop Best Buy's website often come across deals only to find that the items are sold out or on backorder. The site then often directs customers to proceed to the local store to purchase the item (usually denying customers the option to buy online with in-store pickup).

At first glance, this doesn't seem like such a bad idea: 1) the customer can receive the same price at the store and 2) the customer doesn't have to wait for shipping or pay shipping charges by picking up the item from a local Best Buy store. The problem, however, comes from the fact that Best Buy continues to operate an internal BestBuy.com website at its B&M stores that shows higher pricing than the "official" Best Buy website.

"I took [the Kodak EasyShare EX1011] to a different station and asked them to price check it, and it came up at $255.99, well over the $234.49 that was listed online," said one tipster for The Consumerist. "We went to one of their public computer terminals and searched it and it came up at the $255.99, no surprise."

Not one to kneel down and admit defeat, the tipster pressed forward in order to receive the merchandise at the $234.99 price.

"iPhone to the rescue. At first it was showing the $255 price on my iPhones browser, then I realized it was connected through WiFi, so they have it blocking the external Best Buy site and feeding the fake one. I disabled WiFi and searched again and bam, there it was, $234.99," the tipster continued. "The electronics department said I had to go to customer service for such a thing, and they promptly took care of the price change."

The news of the continued operation of Best Buy's internal website with higher prices may come as a shock to some considering the lawsuit brought against the company by Connecticut attorney general Richard Blumenthal.

A Best Buy spokeswoman noted in May of this year that the company was in the process of making changes to eliminate the pricing discrepancies between Best Buy's website and the internal Best Buy site. "We provided immediate training for our employees to help ensure that all customers received the best price," said Best Buy spokeswoman Susan Busch in late May. "We are in the process of making changes to eliminate future confusion."

It appears that Best Buy's efforts to change its internal website are progressing a bit slower than initially thought.

"We thought Best Buy had addressed this," said Blumenthal to the LA Times. "That's what they said to us. Apparently that's not the case."

Best Buy recently made headlines for its stellar fiscal 2008 Q3 performance. The company saw its overall quarterly profits rise 17 percent thanks to hot items including flat-panel TVs, notebook computers and GPS units.

Best Buy's market dominance has come at the expense of one of its closest rivals: CompUSA. CompUSA recently announced that it will close all of its remaining 103 stores at the start of 2008.

http://www.dailytech.com/Best+Buy+Conti ... e10132.htm

While the dual website (and more to the point, dual pricing) notion is hardly a business practice I endorse, the terminals I have visited *inside* various Best Buy locations have very explicit notification that the prices and availability listed are "in store" only.

Customers who shop Best Buy's website often come across deals only to find that the items are sold out or on backorder. The site then often directs customers to proceed to the local store to purchase the item (usually denying customers the option to buy online with in-store pickup).

This description also differs from my experience - in fact, it's normally the reverse. When a product is out of stock at a given location, customers are either directed to visit the website (or directly assisted if you're lucky enough to get an employee who really knows what they're doing) to check availability at other nearby locations or to order the item online. If it's "sold out" or on "backorder", that usually means that the stores are out, too.

Best Buy does have some online-only offers which do not extend to instore purchases, but that's fairly common.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 1247
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
This is nothing new.
I seem to recall us discussing this on the old ICE board.
(Best) Buyer Beware!

peace,
joebase


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:07 pm 
User avatar
I love Music & hate brickwalled audio

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 37646
Location: The Pasture
Tricky Kid wrote:
Does Geek Squad still work exclusively for Best Buy? I swear I saw one of their vehicles outside a Circuit City last week...

I'm pretty sure that "Geek Squad" IS Best Buy.

_________________
Putty Cats are God's gift to the universe.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Best Buy
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:41 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 17632
Location: Florida
Best Buy Gives Credits to Buyers of Outmoded HD DVD
Move follows Circuit City’s policy of refunding returned units

By Matthew B. Zeidman

HOLLYWOOD, CA (Hollywood Today) 3/21/08 – Early HD DVD adopters received no love from Toshiba, who announced the high-definition video format’s death on Feb. 19, but retailer Best Buy doesn’t want to leave its customers with a bad taste in their mouths.

The chain announced on Thursday that all consumers who purchased a Toshiba HD DVD player or Microsoft Xbox 360 add-on before Feb. 23 would each receive a $50 gift card to spend at the store however they pleased. Combination players, which also play rival format Blu-ray, will be exempt from the policy, as will computers with HD DVD drives. Best Buy has estimated $10 million in gift cards will be claimed by customers.

Best Buy’s announcement came two weeks after competitor Circuit City promised its HD DVD buyers store credit for the entire purchase price of their now-obsolete players if the units were returned within 90 days of purchase.

Though functionally similar, Sony’s Blu-ray format was able to soundly outsell HD DVD, leading developer Toshiba to discontinue production of all HD DVD hardware. Toshiba has pledged to continue to provide technical support to consumers and has pointed out that existing players are able to increase the playback quality of standard-definition DVDs.

_________________
Rick A.


Top
  Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  ( Next )
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 249 posts ]   



Who is WANline

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powdered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

IMWAN is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide
a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk.