“IMWAN for all seasons.”



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  ( Next )
Author Message
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:21 pm 
User avatar
Ancient Alien Theorist

Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 105335
Location: The Fourth World
Bannings: 2001
Maybe I'm the only one, but I always find Brian Hibbs' annual column on the BookScan numbers for graphic novels to be fascinating -- mainly because the top books, publishers, genres, etc. are so radically different than what's happening in the Direct Market. I've always thought that these are the sales people should pay attention to when considering how to hook new readers and children into the hobby.

Despite the gargantuan length, this clipping is actually heavily edited down, focusing mainly on the stuff that would interest us fanboys...

Quote:
Crunching 2011's Book Scan Numbers

The bookstore market buys their material returnable, where they can send back some portion of titles that don't sell. Because of this, sell-through is the data that is tracked and trended. Bookstores that have POS systems are able to report their sales to BookScan, a subsidiary of Nielsen.

BookScan generally claims to represent between 70% and 75% of sales in the industry (Wal-Mart and some of the supermarket chains are among those who decline to report.) But a comparison with in-print figures supplied by publishers reveals that the numbers are more likely to represent about 65%, even after deducting for unsold books and returns.

2011 Overview

One major note for 2011 is, of course, the Death of Borders through the year. The final Borders stores finally closed down in September 2011. Borders, all by itself, was once approximately something like 15% of the bookstore sales market. Borders, more importantly, really originally broke the manga category in America, and when you see the fairly horrific drops the bookstore market for comics is showing this year, constantly bear in mind that the number two retail chain utterly collapsed this year.

The sum of the Top 750 in 2011 is down by some 11% in unit sales, and 6% down in dollars purchased. This is the third consecutive year of sales drops in both categories, and the fourth year of drops in volume. The bookstore market in 2011 is down by an entire third of the units sold at its peak in 2007.

Image

Obviously, a portion of this drop can be attributed to the general economic malaise that we're facing in this country, and another big chunk of it can go on the books as relating to the loss of Borders. What's actually a little optimistic, in my mind, is that the drops that the 2011 market shows is a smaller percentage drop than it was in 2010. That suggests to me, possibly, that if Border's hadn't had its troubles, or if the economic climate had been better, then we could have seen a flat or improved year in the bookstores.

(It may or may not be worth mentioning that the comic book store market ended 2011 up 4.57% in periodical comics unit sales, down 5.01% in dollars in book sales.)

2011 was also a fairly weak year for media tie-ins driving book sales -- there was no "Watchmen," as in 2009, or "Scott Pilgrim" in 2010. Even "Walking Dead," which is a true comics phenomenon these days had sales on many of the individual titles that were lower than 2010 sales.

What I do think we can see is that the weakening of manga as a category is now bringing down the general overall numbers in a very visible way -- manga sales are down, in the top 750, some $35 million from their 2007 peak, while the overall market is only down by $15 million in that same period. Manga still dominates sales for now, but its fall as a category is masking at least some real growth overall from other categories (especially children's comics).

    The #1 item this year is exactly the same as it was last year: Rachel Renee Russell's "Dork Diaries."
    Coming in at #2 for the year is "Big Nate: From the Top" with 84k copies.
    The #3 comic for 2011 was also the #3 comic of 2010: Dav Pilkey's "The Adventures of Ook and Gluk, Kung-Fu Cavemen from the Future."
    The #4 best-selling title is the first volume of art spiegelman's "Maus" at about 36k.

    #5 in 2011 is the first sign of Robert Kirkman's juggernaut of "The Walking Dead" -- and somewhat surprisingly it's for the $60 compendium. This comes in at 35k copies (beating last year's performance of about 29k). That, coupled with the cover price, makes it the #1 dollar book of the year, with $2.1 million dollars in retail sales. Every single volume of "The Walking Dead" makes the top 750 chart, in every format to boot!

    To help you put this in perspective, there are 243 books on the (entire!) BookScan list this year that start with the word "Batman" (obviously, not every single Batman-featuring trade has that as the very first word, however) -- those books sum up to 308k copies sold, and $6m. Superman? $1.4m. Star Wars? $1.9m. Spider-Man? Just $672k. Naruto? $2.9m. "The Walking Dead" is bigger than all of them, and even bigger than several of them combined.

    The #6 best-seller this year is the second volume of the manga-style adaptation of "Twilight," with 34k copies sold.
    #7 this year is the first volume of Jeff Smith's "Bone," with about 33k copies.
    #8 is the first volume of Marjane Satrapi's "Persepolis" with 32k sold.
    #9 is our first real piece of Manga, with "Naruto" v50 just over 31k.
    Coming in at #10 is last year's beauty, "Scott Pilgrim" v1.

What if you sort the chart by dollars grossed, instead? That actually looks fairly different [Marvel, DC, Dark Horse & Image bolded]:

$2,121,546.35 - WALKING DEAD COMPENDIUM 1
$2,049,640.14 - DORK DIARIES
$897,552.00 - SCOTT PILGRIMS PRECIOUS LITTLE (box set)
$839,609.55 - BIG NATE FROM THE TOP
$793,818.13 - WALKING DEAD BK 1 (hardcover)
$688,660.00 - HABIBI
$685,597.03 - TWILIGHT GRAPHIC NOVEL V 2
$642,848.85 - PERSEPOLIS 1
$544,718.20 - MAUS I
$502,500.00 - THOR BY WALTER SIMONSON OMNIBUS
$477,998.39 - WALKING DEAD BK 6 (HC)
$447,976.97 - WALKING DEAD BK 2 (HC)

$434,404.45 - COMPLETE PERSEPOLIS
$422,208.79 - WATCHMEN
$409,515.14 - V FOR VENDETTA NEW E

$391,403.89 - WALKING DEAD V 14 NO WAY OUT
$380,633.08 - BATMAN THE RETURN OF BRUCE WAYNE
$376,982.26 - WALKING DEAD BK 5 (HC)
$370,311.15 - SCOTT PILGRIM V 1 SCOTT PILGRIM
$364,854.00 - BATMAN HUSH


DC Comics

The largest publisher of Western comics is DC Comics. In 2011 they placed a strong 107 titles in the Top 750, for 661k units, and a hair over $13m in retail dollars.

C reverses last year's post "Watchmen" drop, both placing more books, as well as totaling greater sales. This is a fine performance given the overall woes in publishing and the economy.

    As has been the going trend for six years now, "Watchmen" is DC's #1 best-selling title, selling just over 21k copies in 2011. That is down substantially from the 29k it sold last year, and the book's lowest sales since 2005, when it sold 17k copies.

    Still, given the fairly steady performance, at least relatively, over the last six years, it isn't really any surprise that DC would like to publish a second (or third) volume of "Watchmen," is it? If it even did only half as well as the original, it would be a perpetual top 20 success for DC's backlist. "Watchmen" represents an almost half-a-million dollar gross sale in the bookstore market this year, and DC didn't have to barely lift a finger to make that happen.

    It's also worth noting its performance relative to other DC-owned properties -- "Watchmen" fairly consistently sells better than the best-selling "Batman" graphic novel.

    Only the other hand, as I write this I'm checking Amazon (I know! But I don't get access to those BookScan numbers!) for "Gone With the Wind" and it's #8,248 in books, while it's official sequel, "Scarlett," is #839,112, so who knows if the bookstore audience will even cotton to a Watchmen prequel?

    DC's second-best-selling title this year, short by about 90 copies, is "Batman: Year One," spurred, I'm sure, in no small part by the release of the animated DVD of the story.

    #3, at just over 20k, is also Alan Moore with "V For Vendetta." This book is down a smidge from last year (when it was #2), but it perhaps has a higher profile this year, what with the use of the Guy Fawkes' masks by some people participating in the "Occupy" protests. What's ironic is that most of the people buying the masks are likely buying the "official" ones which of course are manufactured by Time/Warner, one of the largest and most powerful corporations on the planet.

    #4-6 are all Batman books ("Dark Knight," "Killing Joke" and "Hush") [20k, 19k, and 14k, respectively], as are #8 ("Arkham Asylum" -- 13k), #9 ("Return of Bruce Wayne" -- 13k), #12 (The "Noel" OGN HC, with 12k sold in just about 6 weeks' time) #14 ("Long Halloween" -- 8800), and #15 ("Batman & Robin" v3 -- 8700) Batman is just a little bit popular, eh? In fact, nearly a full third (32) books that DC places in the Top 750 feature pointy-ears, selling almost a quarter-million books, and grossing $4.8m

    #7 is "Superman Earth One" with nearly 14k copies sold. I am crazy super-curious to see what happens with the second volume of that story, as well as "Batman Earth One" debuting later this year.

    #10 is the first Vertigo book, being v15 of "Fables" and placing a bit over 12k copies. (v14 is at #16 with not quite 9k) Interestingly, to me, v1 only has about half of that (6797) -- I'm used to seeing much more of a bell-curve pattern on active and ongoing series (witness "The Walking Dead" or "Naruto").


The #2 western publisher, for the second year running, via the stores that report to BookScan, to be Scholastic.

The #3 Western publisher by pieces in 2011's >BookScan Report is Image Comics, with 27 placing books in the Top 750, for some 367k copies. Image also pulls in $8.7m in retail dollar sales, which, if we were ranking by dollars, would make them the incredibly solid #2.

The #4 Western publisher goes, once again, to Random House.

The #5 largest publisher within the Western portion of Top 750, while looking at total units sold is Simon & Shuster.

The #6 largest publisher in the Western comics space, by the BookScan Top 750, is the crew from Portland: Oni Press.

The #7 Western publisher within the BookScan Top 750 goes to Dark Horse Comics.

The #8 Western publisher within the Top 750 is Marvel Comics, which places 27 titles for about 128k copies and $3.3m sold.


Marvel Comics

I think it is clear at this point that Marvel, at least in the Bookstore market, isn't really that significant of a player able to drive very many hits. Yes, they're largely dominant in the Direct Market channels, and they rule periodical comics, but their backlist strategy does not seem to be paying off with any kind of solid results.

This is also while Marvel had not just one, not just two, but three successful films featuring their characters in 2011. Those three films together grossed nearly 1.2 billion (with a "b"!) dollars at the box office, and yet Marvel doesn't even be able to seem to sell more than 7158 copies of a book ("Siege") that features any of those characters. In fact, that's not even Marvel's best-selling title!

Let me give you what I happen to think is the most plus-perfect example one might be able to name. As we established earlier, "The Walking Dead" is one of the hottest Western comics today. That is a money-printing machine right now, and Robert Kirkman can do no wrong. Even a book just reprinting the covers of "TWD" managed to sell 2700 copies in the BookStore market.

Marvel has a book by the same writer; in the same genre, even, one might argue, with a clearer and more branded name in "Marvel Zombies," and Marvel can only shift 3239 copies -- just five hundred copies more than a book of the covers, for crying out loud. Plus, and here's the bonus, it's not even a cash-in work -- it's good comics that are a ton of fun to read.

That, you will forgive me for editorializing, is sad.

    Marvel's largest success in the bookstores this year isn't anything featuring any of their characters -- it is "Castle: Deadly Storm," a meta-tie-in to a mildly-rated television show. That book sells 9634 copies to BookScan reporters.

    Marvel's #2 best-seller is the latest from Stephen King's "Dark Tower" tie-ins, "The Journey Begins," with 8619 copies sold. This is about half of what last-year's best-selling "Dark Tower" book, "The Fall of Gilead," sold. Four "DT" books placed in the Top 750, and they are, for Marvel, #4, #7, and #11. Down to 4482 there at the end.

    #3 for Marvel is the aforementioned "Siege." Its companion, "Siege: Battlefield" is #14, with 4196 copies sold.

    Three of Marvel's best-sellers are adaptations of Public Domain work -- "Wonderful Wizard of Oz" is #5 with just over 6k copies sold, while "Marvelous Land of Oz is down with 3277 copies sold. They are joined at #12 with "Dracula" and 4413 copies sold.

    #6 is Mark Millar's "Wolverine: Old Man Logan" (5942), and Millar's "Civil War" is #8 (5733). Millar also takes #10 with "Nemesis" (4918), #13 for "Kick-Ass" in hardcover (4211), and again at #20 in softcover (3508). Last year the "Kick-Ass" hardcover sold a bit over 38k copies, thanks to the film.

    Marvel's #9 book is a semi-random collection of Avengers-related #1s "The Heroic Age." This is also Marvel's last seller over 5k for the year, with 5166 copies sold.

    The best-selling book with "Thor" in the title ("Thor" having grossed $449m in world-wide box office, you understand) is actually the $125 Walt Simonson Omnibus (only 4020 copies, but that cover price makes it the #10 dollar book for the entire year with a gross retail of just over half-a-million dollars.

The best-selling "X-Men" titled book is "X-Men: Age of X" (3237) sold, though it's is beaten by "Uncanny X-Force: Apocalypse Solution" (3807). Neither is even remotely akin to the film "X-Men: First Class."

No "Captain America"-titled book makes the Top 750 -- "Reborn" comes in at #837 with 2903 copies. Again, no apparent bounce from the film.

I think it is worth mentioning that Marvel flooded the market in advance of "Cap" and "Thor" with miniseries, where it was stated the goal was to have a wide backlist in place when the films came out. Not a single one of those books that were purportedly created with the film-goers in mind, made the Top 750. Marvel harmed its own brand in its core market by flooding out more material than the market could support, and it appears to have gained absolutely nothing from it on the back end.

I firmly believe that, with proper inventory management, Marvel could easily sell enough material to become the #1 Western publisher in the book market (and, do it in such a way that would not increase their risk-to-return ratios to any large degree), but clearly they'd need to abandon this plan predicated on "what's in the theatre," because it simply isn't working for them, in either market.

SO MUCH MOAR: http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=36900


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:41 pm 
User avatar
Ancient Alien Theorist

Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 105335
Location: The Fourth World
Bannings: 2001
And here we see a comparison with Direct Market numbers --

    Direct Market Comics, Trades, GNs, and Magazines (Comichron): $417 million

    Mass Market Trades and GNs (Hibbs/Bookscan): around $225 million

    Newsstand Comics (Comichron/USPS): around $35 million

    Subscription Comics (Comichron/USPS): $5 million

    Comic book and trade paperback sales in North America: $660-690 million

http://blog.comichron.com/2012/02/big-p ... s-and.html


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:50 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68687
Bannings: One too few . . .
The Walking Dead model is something to take notice of -- a single series, grows in popularity, and drives snowballing sales of the archival editions and the new issues.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
One thing that helps Walking Dead (and helped Scott Pilgrim) is being adapted.

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:27 am 
User avatar
...

Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 59406
That kung-fu cavemen one looks awful. :(


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:53 pm 
User avatar
Ancient Alien Theorist

Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 105335
Location: The Fourth World
Bannings: 2001
Monk wrote:
One thing that helps Walking Dead (and helped Scott Pilgrim) is being adapted.

Walking Dead was fairly successful before adaptation, no? Obviously nowhere near as popular as after the show but I thought it was still Kirkman's flagship book, even outselling Invincible.


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
Hanzo the Razor wrote:
Monk wrote:
One thing that helps Walking Dead (and helped Scott Pilgrim) is being adapted.

Walking Dead was fairly successful before adaptation, no? Obviously nowhere near as popular as after the show but I thought it was still Kirkman's flagship book, even outselling Invincible.


Oh, it definitely was. I think the TV show is what made it a mainstream success, though. I think the problem with trying to look at the list as a model to follow is that it's like DC or Marvel trying to come up with "the next Watchmen". Really, there's no real pattern to it that they can follow. Scott Pilgrim is self-contained and was helped by an adaptation. Walking Dead is ongoing and was helped by an adaptation. Perseopolis is self-contained and helped by an adaptation. There are random Batman books that are self-contained, but trying to come up with the next Year One, Dark Knight Returns, or Long Halloween is obviously going to be hit or miss.

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:13 pm 
User avatar
Ancient Alien Theorist

Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 105335
Location: The Fourth World
Bannings: 2001
Monk wrote:
Oh, it definitely was. I think the TV show is what made it a mainstream success, though. I think the problem with trying to look at the list as a model to follow is that it's like DC or Marvel trying to come up with "the next Watchmen". Really, there's no real pattern to it that they can follow.

Maybe Marvel and DC should figure out a way for movie studios to do films based on their properties. :D


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:20 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68687
Bannings: One too few . . .
Monk wrote:
Hanzo the Razor wrote:
Monk wrote:
One thing that helps Walking Dead (and helped Scott Pilgrim) is being adapted.

Walking Dead was fairly successful before adaptation, no? Obviously nowhere near as popular as after the show but I thought it was still Kirkman's flagship book, even outselling Invincible.


Oh, it definitely was. I think the TV show is what made it a mainstream success, though. I think the problem with trying to look at the list as a model to follow is that it's like DC or Marvel trying to come up with "the next Watchmen". Really, there's no real pattern to it that they can follow. Scott Pilgrim is self-contained and was helped by an adaptation. Walking Dead is ongoing and was helped by an adaptation. Perseopolis is self-contained and helped by an adaptation. There are random Batman books that are self-contained, but trying to come up with the next Year One, Dark Knight Returns, or Long Halloween is obviously going to be hit or miss.


It's all related, though. When you have a good idea that is published in a way that's friendly to new readers, you can demonstrate a growing readership -- and that's the kind of thing that gets selected to be adapted. Then the adaptation causes more people to hop on, buy the back editions, and it snowballs.

When you just fire airballs all over the place, your following never coalesces enough to show a "sticky" following.

The Big Two are addicted to the revenues that an explosion of titles brings each month. But if they could somehow get off that teat, and develop some really popular individual titles, they could enjoy a similar amount of revenue from a long-running set of back editions like Scott Pilgrim and Walking Dead do.

Their whole focus should be "How can we develop a Batman book that is thought of as THE Batman book, such that a group of books develops that everyone feels they have to go back to the beginning." Not "How can we proliferate Batman into a family of 12 titles."

Maybe Batman was a bad example, because he's a sales juggernaut. But the NEXT great character should be done in the Scott Pilgrim mode. So when they launch all these 52 titles, fine one that's hot, and then keep it going -- keep the creative team together, keep the numbering, keep the trade dress. Hopefully they plan to do that.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:59 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
The problem is, for every Scott Pilgrim or Walking Dead, there are a dozen Blue Mondays, Six Guns, Stumptowns, etc, that don't have anywhere near the same success, or even the success of your average Marvel or DC book. It's not about firing airballs all over the place - every company does that. It's about occasionally making some of those shots, and there's no proven formula for doing that.

I agree that Marvel and DC would probably be helped by having a clearer and better-defined trade program with a limited number of titles. One problem with that, though, is that it would require a clearing of the decks to get a lot of the currently existing trades off the shelf, and that's material that sells to a different audience. It'd be a huge risk on their part to essentially abandon that market in the hopes of getting a totally new audience.

I think the best middle ground is the DC/Vertigo approach. DC probably gets plenty of new readers in the mainstream market with their Vertigo books. And, sometimes, a collection like Batman: Hush crosses over and becomes a perennial seller for them. Meanwhile, they have superhero material that can appeal to new readers, current readers, and lapsed readers.

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:35 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68687
Bannings: One too few . . .
Yeah, but my point is you launch them in a way that each new attempt is intended to be a Scott Pilgrim. When it's not, you cancel it and try again. When it's a hit, keep it going.

But the basic format is long-running titles, smaller number of them.

Not ill-conceived renumbering schemes and projects -- take, for example Hickman FF. They screw with the numbering, start a book called "FF," then bring back Fantastic Four for 600, keep FF going a while, then you know they'll merge it in. Fail.

That was created in an evironment that says "Launch a bunch of #1's." Because they're still addicted to that bump that new #1 issue gets. But they're being short-sighted. If you get a long-running book, you get a lot snowball sales when new readers jump on.

So, they need to stop the short-lived gimmicks designed to get collectors and jumpers-on to buy it, know that it will not last. They need to stick with it.

You've got to start to develop a catalog that is bookstore friendly and Amazon friendly.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:35 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68687
Bannings: One too few . . .
My post looks longer than yours. The secret is hitting the return key.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Admin
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:02 pm 
User avatar
Helpful Librarian

Joined: Day WAN
Posts: 197032
Location: IMWAN Towers
Bannings: If you're not nice
I keep seeing "So, What Comics Are Non-Fatboys Reading?" every time this thread gets bumped.

_________________
Image


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:43 pm 
User avatar
Ancient Alien Theorist

Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 105335
Location: The Fourth World
Bannings: 2001
Li'l Jay wrote:
My post looks longer than yours. The secret is hitting the return key.

I was wondering what was going on.


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:15 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 26688
Location: Center of the Universe.
I think that the comic book companies should make a deal with the movie studios that when it comes time to market the DVDs in dept. stores, that the displays should be dual with part containing a place for the graphic novel for which the movie was based. This would go a long way introducing people to the medium.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:40 pm 
User avatar
The Kilted Wonder.

Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 30668
Location: Out of his mind...
Bannings: I wouldn't count on it...
Do Non-Fanboys read comic books?

_________________
"Don't look back, you're not going that way."


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:00 pm 
User avatar
Ancient Alien Theorist

Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 105335
Location: The Fourth World
Bannings: 2001
Night Owl wrote:
I think that the comic book companies should make a deal with the movie studios...

But they're now owned by the movie studios... what leverage do they have?


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:46 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 26688
Location: Center of the Universe.
Hanzo the Razor wrote:
Night Owl wrote:
I think that the comic book companies should make a deal with the movie studios...

But they're now owned by the movie studios... what leverage do they have?


Not all of them are.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:47 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 26688
Location: Center of the Universe.
Hanzo the Razor wrote:
Night Owl wrote:
I think that the comic book companies should make a deal with the movie studios...

But they're now owned by the movie studios... what leverage do they have?


They might not need leverage. A deal doesn't always have to be confrontational. They might just propose a mutually acceptable marketing strategy.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
The strange thing about Scott Pilgrim is that it was an almost entirely one-sided success. Tons of books were ordered by bookstores in anticipation of the film, the film bombed (sadly), but the books benefited from the additional exposure.

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:49 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68687
Bannings: One too few . . .
Add that to the pile of weird that is Scott Pilgrim. I just don't get it at all.

But it illustrates that if you can hit big, a general mass market audience will buy multiple volumes of archives.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: So, What Comics Are Non-Fanboys Reading?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
I'm reading the books right now and really enjoying them. I think what worked for them in bookstores is that they're essentially geek manga for North Americans. And it was, for awhile, heavily stocked and promoted in one of the main outlets for American manga readers - Barnes & Noble and Borders.

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Go to page 1, 2  ( Next )
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 29 posts ]   



Who is WANline

Users browsing this forum: Apple [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powdered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

IMWAN is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide
a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk.