Bubbles wrote:
Fair enough.
I never even thought to compare them until you mentioned it and now that I am comparing them I can not say with any degree of certitude which is better. Of course it all comes down to opinion and I am slightly more inclined to lean toward Ditko, but a lot of that has to do with him as a person and not him as an artist.
We actually tend to argue about their contribution to Silver Age Marvel. I say that that Lee, Kirby, and Ditko are an inseparable trio, without which we cannot even imagine Silver Age Marvel. I think Ditko's presence and contribution affected the way things transpired.
Hanzo thinks it's more about Lee and Kirby, and we would have seen something very much like what we saw of Silver Age Marvel without Ditko's contribution. He sees Kirby as the main, essential figure, and finds a significant gap between the importance of Kirby and the importance of Ditko.
I think the younger Ditko had an influence on Kirby -- Spider-man being the best run out of the gate, Ditko brought a more intimate personal touch to everything he was given. It helped Kirby raise his game and start pouring more of his creative spirit into the Marvel superhero titles.
This thread is proof of that.
