View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Darin
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:10 pm |
|
Joined: | 14 Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 17145 |
Location: | La Crosse, WI |
Bannings: | Not as often these days. |
|
This was a question posed at my LCS this week. Most of us felt that if Miller had not had his '80s run on Daredevil, the character would be not much bigger than Moon Knight is today.
_________________ Darin Wagner
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Beachy
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:10 pm |
|
 |
Mr. IMWANKO
|
Joined: | 18 Sep 2005 |
Posts: | 73865 |
Location: | the Moist Periphery of Pendulum Tide |
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Li'l Jay
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:12 pm |
|
 |
It scorched
|
Joined: | 28 May 2006 |
Posts: | 68692 |
Bannings: | One too few . . . |
|
No way. Moribund property headed for stink pile.
Miller saved Daredevil.
_________________ Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
MILFbait
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:14 pm |
|
 |
The Kilted Wonder.
|
Joined: | 02 Dec 2004 |
Posts: | 30668 |
Location: | Out of his mind... |
Bannings: | I wouldn't count on it... |
|
There might have been a Daredevil, but the only Daredevil material I even read or cared about was the Miller material.
_________________ "Don't look back, you're not going that way."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Dave Toxik
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:16 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Eh?
|
Joined: | 12 Mar 2007 |
Posts: | 25349 |
|
Someone would have given him a good run. Them's the odds.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Beachy
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:48 pm |
|
 |
Mr. IMWANKO
|
Joined: | 18 Sep 2005 |
Posts: | 73865 |
Location: | the Moist Periphery of Pendulum Tide |
|
Really, the book has always been about great highs and lows, and there were many quality creators contributing to those highs: Miller's runs were quite good, perhaps the best, but there's also Wally Wood, Lee and Colan, Bendis (yes, especially the early Bendis), Brubaker and Lark, Nocenti (at times) with JRJr, DG Chichester had a few nice issues, Kesel & Nord were fun.
These days I pretty much hate everything that Bendis writes, but Daredevil vol. 2 was pretty damn stinky until Bendis showed up. I bought DD through thick and thin, so, I didn't much notice who was writing it when Bendis showed up. I just noticed that the direction all the sudden had gotten fantastic. Is it better than Miller's? Maybe. Would Bendis have been able to do it without Miller having gone first? Probably not. Bendis was good at reimaging old stuff and giving it new life. Miller retconned the old stuff by adding ninjas. And, well... after having read Daredevil for years, the sudden appearance of Stick and Elektra always felt a little forced. I'm not sure I ever bought into it, despite its obvious success and overwhelming presence in DD today.
So, while I still maintain that we would have had a Daredevil book today without MIller, I can't exactly say what it would look like. It's quite possible that it might look very much the same.
_________________ Staging Areas Approach Area Area of a Triquetra Area of Effect Life Longing
|
|
Top |
|
 |
RobertSwanderson
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:35 am |
|
 |
Bigger and Better!
|
Joined: | 01 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 52207 |
Location: | WGBS |
|
Silly.
Of course Daredevil would still have a title.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Jon Watkins
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:41 am |
|
Joined: | 29 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 300 |
|
Woulda died like PM/IF. Then he'd have shown up in other titles until some writer with a fondness for him tried to get him going again...just like any other property that never found a clear enough voice. Miller gave it a voice.
Batman's.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Night Owl
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:51 am |
|
Joined: | 26 Dec 2006 |
Posts: | 26688 |
Location: | Center of the Universe. |
|
Beachy wrote: Really, the book has always been about great highs and lows, and there were many quality creators contributing to those highs: Miller's runs were quite good, perhaps the best, but there's also Wally Wood, Lee and Colan, Bendis (yes, especially the early Bendis), Brubaker and Lark, Nocenti (at times) with JRJr, DG Chichester had a few nice issues, Kesel & Nord were fun.
These days I pretty much hate everything that Bendis writes, but Daredevil vol. 2 was pretty damn stinky until Bendis showed up. I bought DD through thick and thin, so, I didn't much notice who was writing it when Bendis showed up. I just noticed that the direction all the sudden had gotten fantastic. Is it better than Miller's? Maybe. Would Bendis have been able to do it without Miller having gone first? Probably not. Bendis was good at reimaging old stuff and giving it new life. Miller retconned the old stuff by adding ninjas. And, well... after having read Daredevil for years, the sudden appearance of Stick and Elektra always felt a little forced. I'm not sure I ever bought into it, despite its obvious success and overwhelming presence in DD today.
So, while I still maintain that we would have had a Daredevil book today without MIller, I can't exactly say what it would look like. It's quite possible that it might look very much the same. I agree with your analysis 100%. The Lee/Colan DDs don't get as much adulation as the other Marvel comics from the same period, but it is a good solid run.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
RobertSwanderson
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:00 am |
|
 |
Bigger and Better!
|
Joined: | 01 Jan 2007 |
Posts: | 52207 |
Location: | WGBS |
|
Did you hear they were going to cancel Batman? IT'S TRUE! If (insert creator here) hadn't come along, Batman would've lost his book! I'M SERIOUS!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Jeff
IMWAN Mod |
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:06 am |
|
 |
The Modfather; Wizard of WAN
|
Joined: | 05 Oct 2006 |
Posts: | 56220 |
Location: | Under the Iron Bridge |
Bannings: | freely handed out |
|
Isn't it true that was actually about to happen before the 60s TV show came out and was a hit?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bolgani Gogo
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:56 am |
|
Joined: | 11 Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 22582 |
Location: | Fredericton, New Brunswick |
|
Let's put it this way... how's She-Hulk doing?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
luelyron
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:45 am |
|
 |
General Sage
|
Joined: | 07 Dec 2007 |
Posts: | 3678 |
Location: | San Diego, CA |
Bannings: | Newsvine, with no explanation |
|
I have a few Miller DDs from his first run. I am crazy about his art.
It's Possible he would be an occasional limited series star...like Fury, Dr. Strange, Submariner...but he always kept a mid-level audience while those three were cancelled many times.
Frank really set the tone for DD, fo sheezy, but I'm going to say "probably yes."
_________________ http://ceaseill.blogspot.com/ There's always writing left.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bubbles
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:07 am |
|
Joined: | 28 Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 21507 |
|
Most likely. I think Beachy nailed it pretty much. He probably wouldn't be as popular and would likely be a completely different character, but most likely he'd still have his own book.
_________________ Refractory innuendos
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Li'l Jay
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:38 am |
|
 |
It scorched
|
Joined: | 28 May 2006 |
Posts: | 68692 |
Bannings: | One too few . . . |
|
He'd be like Doctor Strange, Ghost Rider, Luke Cage Iron Fist, Man-Thing, etc.
Second tier, coming and going, losing his book, occasionally coming back for relaunches, and having periods where he's hot, and good new books. Maybe would have caught on in some other run that was good. Maybe he would currently be hot, maybe he would currently be like Doctor Strange, maybe on the back burner.
But there's no way he would have remained continuously published in an unbroken streak, and he forever got a promotion into the top tier with the best people honored to work on his book.
_________________ Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GoogaMooga
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:28 am |
|
 |
1966 and all that
|
Joined: | 02 Aug 2006 |
Posts: | 11834 |
Location: | San Diego Zoo |
|
As I recall it, the Daredevil title was going to be cancelled, when they gave it a last chance with this young talent, Frank Miller.
_________________ "Don't you think the Beach Boys are boss?" - schoolgirl in the film "American Graffiti"
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stephane Garrelie
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:48 am |
|
Joined: | 08 May 2006 |
Posts: | 12076 |
Location: | France |
|
The pre-Miller stuff by Jim Shooter with Gil JKane and Carmine Infantino was pretty good. The Roger McKenzie run was ok too. And most of all the Death-Stalker was a great character. 
_________________
Last edited by Stephane Garrelie on Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Dr. Chris Evil
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:53 am |
|
 |
Pure Evil Gold!!
|
Joined: | 26 Jul 2006 |
Posts: | 37648 |
Location: | Witness Protection Program |
Bannings: | Ask Linda |
|
Jeff wrote: Isn't it true that was actually about to happen before the 60s TV show came out and was a hit? I had also heard a similar thing about the early '80s.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stephane Garrelie
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:57 am |
|
Joined: | 08 May 2006 |
Posts: | 12076 |
Location: | France |
|
And by great character i'ld go so far as saying that i'ld take the Death-Stalker, Cobra & Hyde or the Gladiator any day other anything Miller did before Born Again. Yeah: Even over Elektra, that i like. Also, the Kingpin belongs to Spider-Man and is a Mutant with Super Strenght as much as a Gangster.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stephane Garrelie
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:59 am |
|
Joined: | 08 May 2006 |
Posts: | 12076 |
Location: | France |
|
Born Again on the other hand is pure awesomeness and probably the best Daredevil story ever. Followed by Ann Nocenti's run with JRjr, which is my second favorite after Born Again.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Simon
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:48 am |
|
 |
...
|
Joined: | 26 Oct 2006 |
Posts: | 59410 |
|
I don't see why Daredevil wouldn't still have survived - and I think some people are giving Miller way too much credit. The comic survived for years before Miller's arrival, and it survived his departure - just as a whole bunch of other Marvel titles survived the arrival and departure of a myriad of creative teams over the years. Of course, I'm not a fan of Daredevil or Frank Miller, and that's just my opinion on the subject. 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stephane Garrelie
|
Post subject: Would there still be a Daredevil ongoing title were it not for Frank Miller? Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:54 am |
|
Joined: | 08 May 2006 |
Posts: | 12076 |
Location: | France |
|
Simon wrote: I don't see why Daredevil wouldn't still have survived - and I think some people are giving Miller way too much credit. The comic survived for years before Miller's arrival, and it survived his departure - just as a whole bunch of other Marvel titles survived the arrival and departure of a myriad of creative teams over the years. Of course, I'm not a fan of Daredevil or Frank Miller, and that's just my opinion on the subject.  
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 4
|
[ 70 posts ] |
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Who is WANline |
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Apple [Bot] and 2 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|